Validation of the Polar Team Pro System for Sprint Speed With Ice Hockey Players.

ABSTRACT: Conners, RT, Whitehead, PN, Dodds, FT, Schott, KD, and Quick, MC. Validation of the polar team pro system for sprint speed with ice hockey players. J Strength Cond Res 36(12): 3468-3472, 2022-Commercially available player tracking sensors such as the Polar Team Pro system (PTPS) have been used to monitor athlete performance. Use during ice hockey practices and games has resulted in seemingly plausible and valid values for internal metrics (heart rate); however, external metrics (distance, speed, and acceleration) seem sporadic and counterintuitive. To determine the validity of the PTPS for measuring sprint speed with collegiate hockey players, 15 NCAA Division I male athletes (21.86 ± 1.04 years, 175.86 ± 6.78 cm, 80.58 ± 4.44 kg) participated in the study. Subjects wore a PTPS strap, at the level of the xiphoid process, and performed 2 sprints of 15.24 m (blue line to blue line) and 35.05 m (red line to the far blue line) in 3 conditions: indoor ice skating, indoor running, and outdoor running. Timing gates (TG) were used to determine sprint times, which allowed for manual calculation of speed. Speed values from the PTPS and TG were compared using paired-samples t -tests, and an alpha level of 0.05, 2-sided, was set a priori as a significance level. For indoor ice skating, PTPS significantly underestimated speeds at both distances ( p < 0.001). However, PTPS significantly overestimated speeds for indoor and outdoor sprints at both distances ( p ≤ 0.001). The PTPS is not accurate for measuring short-distance linear sprint speed or linear sprint speed during indoor ice skating. The inconsistency in speed values needs to be taken into consideration when using the system for science-based training because inaccurate speed values may negatively affect other external performance metrics provided by PTPS.

Shoulder Strength and Range of Motion Between Collegiate Pitchers and Position Players in Baseball.

Baseball is a sport that places excessive strain on the shoulder complex caused from repetitive overhead throws. In the sport of baseball, shoulder strength and range of motion (ROM) are paramount for success on the field. The purpose of this study was to determine strength and ROM differences between collegiate baseball pitchers and position players. It was hypothesized that pitchers would have higher strength and ROM values, due to the volume of throwing a pitcher performs. A total of nine collegiate baseball pitchers and position players (n = 18) volunteered for the study (age = 20.94 ± 1.21 years, height = 183.42 ± 4.74 cm, and mass = 89.56 ± 10.76 kg). Shoulder strength was measured using a Humac Norm isokinetic dynamometer at 180ºsec-1 and 300ºsec-1 and ROM was measured using a goniometer. All participants completed a five-minute warm-up at 50 rpm on an upper body ergometer. Following the warm-up, passive internal and external ROM were measured for the throwing (dominant) arm. No statistical differences were found in external ROM (p = 0.319), internal ROM (p = 0.258), external peak torque @180ºsec-1 (p = 0.467), internal peak torque @180ºsec-1 (p = 0.156), external peak torque @300ºsec-1 (p = 0.225), or internal peak torque @300ºsec-1 (p = 0.137). The findings indicate similar isokinetic strength and flexibility in the throwing shoulder of collegiate athletes who perform repeated overhead throwing motions. Thus, in this study the player's baseball position (pitchers vs. position player) did not influence throwing shoulder strength and ROM characteristics.